![]() ![]() ![]() In fact, such a hypothetical particle travelling at the speed of light - 186,282 miles per second (299,792 kilometres per second) - would gain infinite mass, and require an infinite amount of energy to move. Pictured, Star Trek's USS Discovery travels at warp speed - and is going in the right directionĭeveloped by the physicist Miguel Alcubierre in 1994, the so-called 'Alcubierre warp drive' is a speculative concept for how a spacecraft could effectively achieve faster-than-light travel based on a solution to Einstein's field equations in special relativity.įaster-than-light travel is thought to be impossible, as particles with mass get heavier as they move faster, making it increasingly difficult to accelerate them more. This means that before Captain Kirk says 'Ahead Warp 1, Mr Sulu', he should be checking the Enterprise is already moving, slower-than-light, in the right direction.Ī NASA engineer claimed that getting a 'running start' would be the key to ensuring that a real-life, Star Trek-style warp engine is in drive, and not reverse. The energy density distribution required to bend space is symmetrical - meaning a craft starting at rest might as easily shoot off in reverse as it would go the right way. NASA physicist Harold 'Sonny' White - who specialises in advanced propulsion technology - found that the leading warp drive theory had one major flaw. However, a warp drive could - in theory - allow spacecraft to cheat their way around this rule, by moving parts of spacetime instead of the ship itself. This would make space travel to most planets impractical in the scale of a human lifetime, if one was confined to relativistic speeds. In Albert Einstein's theory of special relativity, our Universe comes with a speed limit - with nothing able to travel faster than the speed of light. A NASA engineer has claimed that getting a 'running start' would be the key to ensuring that a real-life, Star Trek-style warp engine is in drive, and not reverse. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |